Get in touch
Please contact us to discuss how working with Myriad can maximise and secure R&D funding opportunities for your business.
Contact usSpecial Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) ensure you receive your full AVEC entitlement from day 1, without increasing your corporation tax liability. Here's how they work.
Without careful planning, many companies find their Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit (AVEC) trapped until their production completes. This delay can last multiple accounting periods, leaving qualifying expenditure locked away when you need it most.
The solution? A Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). These separate legal entities ensure you receive your full AVEC entitlement and accelerate cash receipt from HMRC. Here's how they work in practice.
The delay comes down to how HMRC requires you to report AVEC claims. Under Section 1179 of the Corporation Tax Act, each qualifying production must be reported as a separate trade. If you've got multiple productions, you'll need to split out your tax computations into multiple trades.
This is where the issue typically arises. While a production is still in progress, it is almost inevitable that it will be loss making as little or no income has yet come in. However, until the production is completed, any losses arising from that production cannot be offset against other trades, including other AVEC productions.
As a result, where an interim claim is made on an incomplete production, those losses become effectively trapped in that accounting period. This means the losses cannot be surrendered against profitable trades, leaving the company exposed to a corporation tax charge on those other activities.
When that production eventually finishes, yes, you can offset those trapped losses against other trades. But that could be multiple accounting periods away.
In its simplest form, an SPV is a separate legal entity set up for a specific production. Each production has its own SPV, which makes reporting considerably easier.
The structure is straightforward. You have a parent company (or multiple companies) with a controlling interest in the production SPV.
Typically, you'll find that a production not completed in the accounting period has incurred costs but has no income to show. The SPV structure solves this by transferring costs and creating income flows that balance each other out, which typically means you are operating breakeven.
SPVs work for TV, film, animation, and video games claims. Whether you're making one production or managing multiple projects, the principle remains the same: each production gets its own SPV.
With an SPV structure, the credit amount remains the same, but HMRC pays it out to the SPV much quicker than it would to a normal company structure.
The mechanics of an SPV structure typically follow a clear seven-step process:
This structure ensures the SPV maintains real economic activity. It's making key decisions, handling contracts, and taking on risk, which is exactly what HMRC requires (more on this below).
Let's look at a real example. Company A has income of £10.5 million and expenditure of £10 million. Without making an AVEC claim, they'd have a taxable profit of £500,000, resulting in corporation tax of £125,000 at 25%.
|
Before AVEC Claim |
Total (£) |
|
Income |
10,500,000 |
|
Expenditure |
-10,000,000 |
|
Taxable Profit |
500,000 |
|
Corporation Tax (25%) |
125,000 |
Now, let's say they have a high-end TV production that's incomplete at year-end, with £1 million in production costs (£950,000 core expenditure, £50,000 non-core).
When claiming AVEC without an SPV, part of your usual company total trade gets moved into a separate trade. In this case, Company A’s main trade now shows £1.5 million taxable profit (because £1 million has been moved to the separate AVEC trade). That's £375,000 corporation tax due.
The AVEC trade calculation looks like this:
For more information on calculating your AVEC, check out our blog: What is the Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit Worth?
However, £250,000 of corporation tax is trapped in the AVEC trade because there's no income to offset it against (25% of the £1 million AVEC trade).
Company A receives £193,800 from HMRC for their AVEC claim but owes £375,000 on their main trade. Net position: they're paying HMRC £181,200.
Compare this to their original position (no AVEC claim at all), where they only owed £125,000. The interim AVEC claim has actually made their cash position worse because of the trapped losses.
However, when the production is finished, all the trapped benefit is unlocked (i.e., the total losses from the period and the trapped credit that is carried forward). This results in a total of £250,000 being carried forward. Considering the £181,200 that is paid to HMRC in this period, the company will receive £68,800 net from this period when the production completes.
|
Company A |
||
|
Main Trade |
AVEC Trade |
|
|
Income |
10,500,000 |
|
|
Expenditure |
-10,000,000 |
|
|
Financial Profit |
500,000 |
|
|
Separate AVEC trade for tax |
1,000,000 |
-1,000,000 |
|
AVEC core expenditure |
950,000 |
|
|
Claimable core expenditure (80%) |
|
760,000 |
|
AVEC (34% of claimable expenditure) |
258,400 |
|
|
Taxable Profit/Loss |
1,500,000 |
-741,600 |
|
Corporation Tax due |
-375,000 |
|
|
Carried Forward Loss |
-741,600 |
|
|
AVEC |
258,400 |
|
|
Notional Tax (25%) |
64,600 |
|
|
Net AVEC |
193,800 |
|
|
Net Payment to HMRC |
-181,200 |
|
|
Trapped losses CT benefit carried forward (25% of losses carried forward) |
185,400 |
|
|
Trapped Credit carried forward |
64,600 |
|
|
Total Trapped CT benefit |
250,000 |
|
|
Net Benefit (Total Trapped Benefit minus payment to HMRC in this period) |
68,800 |
|
Now let’s rework this scenario with an SPV to carry out the AVEC trade.
The SPV (Company B) operates at break-even through the commissioning fee arrangement explained above. The production costs are balanced by income from the parent (Company A), so there are no trapped losses. The cross-charges between Company A and Company B are crucial to this working.
In this instance, Company A pays its Corporation Tax as it would if there were no AVEC trade, as the cross-charges have allowed those costs to be incurred then repaid (£125,000). Company B, operating at break-even, receives its AVEC immediately (£193,800).
The group cash flow improves immediately as they receive a net benefit of £68,800 from HMRC, considering Company A’s £125,000 tax bill and Company B’s net AVEC of £193,800.
|
Company A |
Company B |
|
|
Main Company |
Production Company (SPV) |
|
|
Income |
10,500,000 |
|
|
Income / Expenditure via Lending Agreement |
950,000 |
-950,000 |
|
Expenditure |
-10,000,000 |
|
|
Expenditure / Income via Commissioning fee |
-950,000 |
950,000 |
|
Financial Profit |
500,000 |
|
|
Separate AVEC trade for tax |
||
|
AVEC core expenditure |
|
950,000 |
|
Claimable core expenditure (80%) |
|
760,000 |
|
AVEC (34% of claimable expenditure) |
258,400 |
|
|
Taxable Profit |
500,000 |
258,400 |
|
Corporation Tax |
125,000 |
64,600 |
|
AVEC |
258,400 |
|
|
Tax Liability offset |
64,600 |
|
|
Net AVEC |
193,800 |
|
|
Net Benefit |
68,800 |
HMRC's Creative Unit in Manchester is increasingly asking for documentation to support SPV structures. You'll need the following legal framework in place:
Working capital loan agreement: This intercompany loan agreement is straightforward but essential for showing how the SPV is funded.
Production agreement: This is the foundation of your structure. It details the commissioning fee, clarifies who pays for costs, and demonstrates that decision-making sits with the production company. This ties directly into HMRC's compliance requirements.
Transfer pricing policy: Any pricing between the parent and production company must be at arm's length under OECD principles. You need to be able to support your pricing with evidence. Avoid transferring profits across unless justified by increased value through benchmarking.
Management, admin and service agreement: This makes clear what services the parent provides to the production company.
We can't stress enough how important proper documentation has become. As scrutiny increases, having these agreements in place from the start protects your claim.
For more information on making your Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit claim, check out our blog: AVEC Claims: A Step-by-Step Guide to Securing Your Credit
HMRC has specific criteria that your SPV must meet. These come from both legislation and HMRC guidance, and they're designed to ensure SPVs reflect real economic activity.
Your SPV can't simply act as a pass-through lacking control or risk. It needs to be involved in production decisions, handle contracts directly, and take on genuine risk. This is all covered under Section 1179 of the CTA.
Connected parties and transfer pricing is another area where HMRC focuses heavily. The principles under OECD guidelines are clear: transactions must be at arm's length pricing. You'll see this referenced in the Additional Information Form that accompanies your claim.
Timing is critical. You must set up your SPV before costs are incurred. You can't transfer pre-SPV costs into the structure because the SPV didn't exist as a legal entity at that time. The exception is if it's an asset (like rights) that's been built up, which can sometimes be transferred. However, you can include preliminary work as defined by HMRC.
If you set up an SPV halfway through production, you cannot include the first half of the production work. This is why we recommend setting up SPVs as early as possible. Even if you later decide it's not viable for cost or other reasons, having the entity in place means it's there when you need it. The administration to keep it live is minimal.
Yes, the same structure applies to co-productions. Your UK company would be the SPV, and this gives you some legal protection by separating your parent company from the SPV that's part of a co-production with other companies.
Multiple ownership is possible through equity shares in the SPV. Profits or AVEC can be split to each of the controlling parties through dividends, gift aid or other agreed arrangements.
However, you can only claim costs consumed in the UK. You won't be able to claim costs consumed outside the UK, which is likely with international co-producers. The SPV structure works perfectly for this, but your claim is limited to UK consumed expenditure only.
There are currently around 18 different co-production treaties, including a generic European one. The SPV structure we've outlined will work for any of these arrangements, as long as you're clear about which costs qualify for your UK claim.
Whether you're producing TV, animation, or films, this structure ensures you receive your relief when you need it most. The key is planning ahead, setting up the proper legal framework, and ensuring your SPV demonstrates real economic activity from day one.
If you'd like us to review your AVEC structure and help set up an SPV, get in touch.
Want to understand the fundamentals of AVEC first? Watch our AVEC fundamentals webinar, which covers eligibility, qualifying costs, and how to make your first claim.
Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) ensure you receive your full AVEC entitlement from day 1, without increasing your corporation tax liability. Here's how they work.
Not all production costs qualify for Theatre Tax Relief. Discover HMRC's rules on core costs, connected parties, and running expenditure.
Learn how AVEC adviser fees typically work, what services should be included in an AVEC claim, and the red flags to watch for before you engage an adviser.
Please contact us to discuss how working with Myriad can maximise and secure R&D funding opportunities for your business.
Contact us